Question

1)A government meets to discuss policies about controlling pollution. Which is the most appropriate type of information for the government to use to make decisions?

a)stories from other government
b)research reports containing scientific data
c)guesses about the impact of pollutants
d)personal anecdotes from citizens
2)A patient reports side effects from a medication. A government committee learns about the side effects and decides the medication is not safe for public use. Did the committee use science to make the decision?
a)Yes; the committee used research.
b)No; the committee used an anecdote.
c)Yes; all medicine is science.
d)No; committees use rules, not science.
3)Which type of research might result in a law that restricts hunting of a particular species?
a)research showing a decrease in the popularity of hunting
b)research showing the species is harmful
c)research showing an increase in the population of the species
d)research showing the species is endangered in other geographical areas
4)Which statement best explains why a rare disease would get more research funding than a more common disease?
a)Diseases that affect more people tend to get more funding.
b)Sufferers of the rare disease ran a public awareness campaign.
c)Organizations are concerned about the results of the research into the rare disease.
d)Organizations are concerned about the results of the research into the rare disease.
5)A corporation funds scientific research to develop a fabric treatment that absorbs harmful rays from the sun. Which product does the corporation most likely manufacture?
a)garden tools
b)sunscreen
c)patio umbrellas
d)batteries

Answer 1

The most appropriate type of information for the government to use in making pollution control decisions is research reports containing scientific data. When a government committee decides a medication is not safe based on side effects, it is using science. Hunting restrictions can be based on research about decrease in species population, harm, or endangerment. Rare diseases get more funding because organizations are concerned about research results. A corporation that funds fabric treatment to absorb harmful rays mostly manufactures patio umbrellas.

Step-by-step explanation:

The most appropriate type of information for the government to use to make decisions about controlling pollution would be research reports containing scientific data. These reports provide factual and evidence-based information that can help the government understand the impact of pollutants and make informed decisions about policies.

When a government committee decides that a medication is not safe for public use based on reports of side effects from patients, it is using science to make the decision. The committee relies on research and evidence to assess the safety of the medication, rather than relying on anecdotes or personal experiences.

Research that shows a decrease in the population of a particular species, evidence that the species is harmful, or research indicating that the species is endangered in other geographical areas could all result in a law that restricts hunting of that species. These types of research provide scientific evidence of the need for conservation measures to protect the species.

The statement that best explains why a rare disease would get more research funding than a more common disease is that organizations are concerned about the results of the research into the rare disease. Rare diseases often have limited treatment options and less research available, so organizations prioritize funding research that could lead to breakthroughs in understanding and treating the rare disease.

A corporation that funds scientific research to develop a fabric treatment that absorbs harmful rays from the sun most likely manufactures patio umbrellas. This product would be compatible with a fabric treatment that provides sun protection outdoors.