Question

Which sentence provides an effective conclusion for

the argumentative paragraph?

A. Details from the text show that Rainsford did not act
in self-defense, so he is not justified.
B. Rainsford was not justified in killing Zaroff because
killing another human being is wrong no matter
what the cause.
C. Rainsford acted not only in self-defense, but in
defense of others, so he was justified in killing
Zaroff.
D. In conclusion, self-defense is the only situation in
which it is okay to kill a human being.

Answer 1

Rainsford acted not only in self-defense, but in defense of others, so he was justified in killing Zaroff.

Step-by-step explanation:

I took the test ,it is C.

Answer 2

C. Ransford acted not only in self defense, but in denfense of others, so he was justified in killing Zaroff.

Step-by-step explanation:

From what I am reading I think it is C. I am not too sure but you can always try it out!

A explains details and isnt a good conclusion.

B is false

D Doesnt really wrap up the whole context and text not making it a strong conclusion

C is a good strong conclusion wrapping everything up.

I hope this helps you!