Question

Read this excerpt from the Supreme Court's Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier dissenting opinion: The state educator's undeniable, and undeniably vital, mandate to [teach] moral and political values is not a general

asked Oct 4, 2022 89.6k views

Read this excerpt from the Supreme Court's Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier dissenting opinion: The state educator's undeniable, and undeniably vital, mandate to [teach] moral and political values is not a general warrant to act as "thought police" stifling discussion of all but state-approved topics. . . . Official censorship of student speech on the ground that it addresses "potentially sensitive topics" is . . . impermissible.4 The reasoning in this opinion is most similar to the reasoning in which other Supreme Court ruling? A. New Jersey v. T.L.O. B. Miranda v. Arizona C. Gideon v. Wainwright D. Tinker v. Des Moines

Thomas Kekeisen asked

by Thomas Kekeisen

5.1k points

2 Answers

Ask a Question

Notlikethat · Answer 1 · 2022-10-08T21:17:46+0000

Answer:

Tinker v. Des Moines

Step-by-step explanation:

The case of Tinker v. Des Moines is similar to the case of Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier because they both deal with free speech rights.

0 Comments

Please log in or register to add a comment.

Please log in or register to answer this question.

2 Answers

0 Comments

Please log in or register to add a comment.

0 Comments

Please log in or register to add a comment.

Other Questions