187k views
1 vote
The mean score for all NBA games during a particular season was less than 106 points per game. If a hypothesis test is performed, how should you interpret a decision that fails to reject the null hypothesis? There is not sufficient evidence to reject the claim μ < 106. There is sufficient evidence to reject the claim μ < 106. There is not sufficient evidence to support the claim μ < 106. There is sufficient evidence to support the claim μ < 106.

User Feepk
by
8.2k points

2 Answers

4 votes

Answer:

As given in the problem statement

mean score was less than 106

H0:mean score<106

so There is sufficient evidence to reject the claim μ < 106. is correct option.

User Galmi
by
8.2k points
1 vote

Answer:

There is sufficient evidence to reject the claim μ < 106.

Explanation:

Given that the mean score for all NBA games during a particular season was less than 106 points per game

H0: mu =106

H1: mu <106

When fails to reject null hypothesis it is evidence that mean =106

There is sufficient evidence to reject the claim μ < 106.

User Debadatt
by
8.0k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

9.4m questions

12.2m answers

Categories