81.4k views
0 votes
The tallest living man at one time had a height of 262 cm. The shortest living man at that time had a height of 68.6 cm. Heights of men at that time had a mean of 175.32 cm and a standard deviation of 8.17 cm. Which of these two men had the height that was more​ extreme?

2 Answers

3 votes

Answer:

The shortest living man's height was more extreme.

Explanation:

We have been given that the the tallest living man at one time had a height of 262 cm. The shortest living man at that time had a height of 68.6 cm. Heights of men at that time had a mean of 175.32 cm and a standard deviation of 8.17 cm.

First of all, we will find z-scores for both heights suing z-score formula.


z=(x-\mu)/(\sigma)


z=(68.6-175.32)/(8.17)


z=(-106.72)/(8.17)


z=-13.06


z=(x-\mu)/(\sigma)


z=(262-175.32)/(8.17)


z=(86.68)/(8.17)


z=10.61

Since the data point with a z-score
-13.06 is more away from the mean than data point with a z-score
10.61, therefore, the shortest living man's height was more extreme.

User Castilho
by
7.8k points
2 votes

Answer:

more the z-score more will be the extreme. therefore tallest man has high extreme

Explanation:

Formula for z-score:
(X-\mu )/(\sigma)

where

X is height of tallest man

μ mean height

σ is standard deviation

z score for tallest is

z-score =
( 262 - 175.32)/(8.17) = 10.60

similarly for shortest man

z-score =
(68.6 - 175.32)/(8.17) = - 13.06

more the z-score more will be the extreme. therefore tallest man has high extreme

User Agostinho
by
8.8k points