81.4k views
0 votes
The tallest living man at one time had a height of 262 cm. The shortest living man at that time had a height of 68.6 cm. Heights of men at that time had a mean of 175.32 cm and a standard deviation of 8.17 cm. Which of these two men had the height that was more​ extreme?

2 Answers

3 votes

Answer:

The shortest living man's height was more extreme.

Explanation:

We have been given that the the tallest living man at one time had a height of 262 cm. The shortest living man at that time had a height of 68.6 cm. Heights of men at that time had a mean of 175.32 cm and a standard deviation of 8.17 cm.

First of all, we will find z-scores for both heights suing z-score formula.


z=(x-\mu)/(\sigma)


z=(68.6-175.32)/(8.17)


z=(-106.72)/(8.17)


z=-13.06


z=(x-\mu)/(\sigma)


z=(262-175.32)/(8.17)


z=(86.68)/(8.17)


z=10.61

Since the data point with a z-score
-13.06 is more away from the mean than data point with a z-score
10.61, therefore, the shortest living man's height was more extreme.

User Castilho
by
5.2k points
2 votes

Answer:

more the z-score more will be the extreme. therefore tallest man has high extreme

Explanation:

Formula for z-score:
(X-\mu )/(\sigma)

where

X is height of tallest man

μ mean height

σ is standard deviation

z score for tallest is

z-score =
( 262 - 175.32)/(8.17) = 10.60

similarly for shortest man

z-score =
(68.6 - 175.32)/(8.17) = - 13.06

more the z-score more will be the extreme. therefore tallest man has high extreme

User Agostinho
by
5.7k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.