39.6k views
4 votes
Question 4 of 10

2 Points
Having an unreliable narrator in "Top of the Food Chain" leads the reader to:
A. feel morally superior.
O
B. believe he is an expert.
O
c. question his views.
O
D. take his ideas seriously.

User Willcwf
by
5.8k points

1 Answer

5 votes

Answer:

The correct answer is C. question his views.

Step-by-step explanation:

An unreliable narrator, as the name itself suggests, is a type of narrator whom you cannot trust. This narrator isn't completely sure about what he or she is doing, his own actions, emotions, and thoughts are often erratic; they might say one thing at one point in the story, and then something completely different at another.

We have insight into their mind, and we can see that the thoughts are all jumbled and incoherent. If the narrator is unreliable, it just means they cannot be trusted, which is the case in "Top of the Food Chain" as well.

User Upen
by
6.7k points