Answer:
I will answer all of the parts in this table, look there for each value you are asked for:
ABSORPTION COSTING VARIABLE COSTING
Direct Materials 14 14
Direct Labor 16 16
Variable Overhead 3 3
Fixed Overhead 6 do not include them
Unit Cost 39 33
Ending Inventory (UNITS) 6,000 6,000
Ending Inventory (Dollars) $234,000 98,000
Units Sold 16500 16500
Cost of Goods Sold $643,500 $544,500
Net Income diference 36000
Step-by-step explanation:
The variable costing Does not consider the fixed cost part of the unit cost, so they are posted entirely in the net income as expenses.
While the Absorption costing does include them in the unit cost, giving a higher unit value.
This diference (include or not the fixed assets) do not alter the ending inventory or the cost of goods sold, and indirectly the net income as long as the production and the sales equals. Once they difer, what it is happening is that some part of the fixed cost, which are expose entirely as expense in the net income under the variable cost, are hidden inside the ending inventory under the absorption cost.
The unit fixed cost times the ending inventory ($6 x 6,000) makes for the diference in both, net income and ending inventory.
As a result the company looks better under absorption cost, because it has better aassets an a net income higher, but behind that is one of reasons for the failure of absorption cost ot represent the reality. Currently, ABC or standart cost are more common because they have ways to handle this diferences and keep record of them.