198k views
3 votes
Which of the following describes an advantage that secondary sources have over primary sources for historians

User Iluxa
by
4.9k points

1 Answer

4 votes

Answer:

you did not include the choices, but heres a advantage:

usually research is already done, so it proves that it is able to do research on, therefore the historian can carry out more research.

Step-by-step explanation:

User Jasper Risseeuw
by
5.1k points