Final answer:
The wavelength of objects like baseballs is extremely small compared to the size of atoms, rendering such wavelengths undetectable in the macroscopic world. However, for subatomic particles like electrons, their wavelength can be comparable to the size of atoms, influencing their behavior and energy levels within the atom. X-rays have wavelengths comparable to the size of the structures they interact with, allowing them to be effective in observing atomic and molecular structures.
Step-by-step explanation:
When considering the size of an atom, which is typically on the order of 0.1 nanometers (10-10 meters), and comparing it to the wavelengths of various particles or types of radiation, we can make several observations. For instance, the diameter of an atom's nucleus is approximately 10⁻¹⁴ meters.
If we calculate the wavelength of a 0.145 kg baseball moving at 40 m/s, the resultant wavelength would be about 10-34 meters. This is immeasurably small compared to the size of an atom, indicating Their wavelength is very small compared to the object's size.
However, for subatomic particles like electrons, the wavelength is of the same order of magnitude as the size of an atom. The wavelike behavior of electrons is significant when they are confined within the atom, as this affects their possible energy levels. In the case of X-rays, the wavelength is comparable to the size of the structures it interacts with, such as the distances between atoms in a molecule, allowing X-rays to 'see' these structures.
If we scale an atom up to a size comparable to a mid-sized campus, the nucleus would be only a tiny fraction of that size, possibly comparable to a small familiar object like a marble.