158k views
1 vote
Li believes that the graph shows a direct variation. Why is Li incorrect in saying that the graph shows a direct variation?

1) The graph does not have a constant rate of change.
2) When the x-value is 0, the y-value is 1.
3) The slope is negative.
4) The relationship is proportional.

Li believes that the graph shows a direct variation. Why is Li incorrect in saying-example-1
User Kostanos
by
8.3k points

2 Answers

2 votes

Answer:

b. or 2. When the x-value is 0, the y-value is 1.

Explanation:

I just took the quiz ;)

User SanD
by
8.4k points
5 votes

Answer:

Option 2) When the x-value is 0, the y-value is 1.

Explanation:

A relationship between two variables, x, and y, represent a proportional variation if it can be expressed in the form
y/x=k or
y=kx

In a proportional relationship the constant of proportionality k is equal to the slope m of the line and the line passes through the origin

Remember that in a direct variation

For x=0, the value of y is equal to zero too

therefore

The graph is not a direct variation , because

When the x-value is 0, the y-value is 1.

User Alfonso Tienda
by
8.2k points

No related questions found

Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

9.4m questions

12.2m answers

Categories