Question

Which best explains how a historian synthesizes evidence to reach a

conclusion?
O
A. The historian makes comparisons among multiple primary and
secondary sources.
O
B. The historian researches only one primary source and one
secondary source.
O
C. The historian uses only secondary sources to support a claim.
O
D. The historian draws conclusions from a single primary source.

Answer 1

Answer:A: the historian makes comparisons among multiple primary and secondary sources(apex)

Answer 2

The correct answer is A) The historian makes comparisons among multiple primary and secondary sources.

The best statement that explains how a historian synthesizes evidence to conclude is "The historian makes comparisons among multiple primary and secondary sources."

This is an important component of the job of a historian. In order to synthesize evidence, the researcher or historian has to first find the proper evidence through the use of primary resources or secondary resources. The historian has to use the proper evidence, data, numbers, graphics, quotes or statistics that prove that its work is legit.