148k views
5 votes
What significance did weapons of mass destruction have in the U.S invasion of Iraq

A. They said the United States should not start a war without direct provocation
B. They thought the United Nations would be able to take care of the problem.
C. They believed the terrorist would be antagonized and bring further attacks on the United States
D. They thought the United States should address the issue of global warming first.

2 Answers

0 votes

THE ANSWER IS C.) "They believed the terrorist would be antagonized and bring further attacks on the United States"

Explanation: JUST TOOK THE K12 QUIZ

User Xdays
by
4.4k points
4 votes

Answer:

C. They believed the terrorist would be antagonized and bring further attacks on the United States

Step-by-step explanation:

The alleged weapons of mass destruction that Iraq produced and used according to the US officials, were the main reason that the US got involved in a war with Iraq, in order to avoid further attacks on the US and its citizens. In reality though, it turned out that the US officials had other interests for the attack on Iraq, as it turned out that Iraq neither produces nor uses weapons of mass destruction. This brought in a lot of controversy about the war once it went public that the US attacked Iraq on a basis of false allegations.

User Freezethrower
by
4.6k points