70.1k views
6 votes
Josiah claims that the ordered pair (6,-10) can be replaced with any ordered pair and the set will still represent a function. Select all ordered pairs that could be used to show that this claim is incorrect

1 Answer

10 votes

Complete Question:

{(–9, 1), (–5, 2), (0, 7), (1, 3), (6, –10)} Josiah claims that the ordered pair (6, –10) can be replaced with any ordered pair and the set will still represent a function. Select all ordered pairs that could be used to show that this claim is incorrect.

A. (–10, –10)

B. (–9, –6)

C. (–5, 1)

D. (1, 12)

E. (4, 7)

Answer:


B.\ (-9, -6)


C.\ (-5, 1)


D.\ (1, 12)

Explanation:

A relation is represented as:


R->\{(x_1,y_1),(x_2,y_2),(x_3,y_3)...(x_n,y_n)\}

Where


x = domain


y = range

For a relation to be a function, the domain must be unique and must not be repeated.

In the given function,


\{(-9, 1), (-5, 2), (0, 7), (1, 3), (6, -10)\}

The domains are
\{-9,-5,0,1,6\}

So, if (6,-10) is to be replaced;

The domain of the ordered pair that will replace it must not be any of
\{-9,-5,0,1,6\}

From the list of given options:


B.\ (-9, -6)


C.\ (-5, 1)


D.\ (1, 12)

The above can not replace (6,-10) because their domain exist already.

User Merlevede
by
4.8k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.