68.6k views
9 votes
Paula says that 2/3 is equivalent to 4/9 because 4 is a multiple of 2 and 9 is a multiple of 3. explain her error.

User Marcus L
by
8.4k points

1 Answer

8 votes

Answer:

Paula is wrong because, in order to be equivalent, the nominator and denominator of a fraction must have to be multiplied by the same number.

Explanation:

Paula is wrong because, in order to be equivalent, the nominator and denominator of a fraction must have to be multiplied by the same number.

4/9 is basically obtained when we multiply the denominator of 2/3 by 2 and denominator by 3, which is wrong.

Thus, the correction is as follows:

Given the fraction


(2)/(3)

Multiply the nominator and denominator of the fraction by 2


(2* 2)/(3* 2)=(4)/(6)

Thus, the 4/6 is the correct equivalent expression of 2/3.

User Koceeng
by
7.8k points

No related questions found

Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

9.4m questions

12.2m answers

Categories