261,354 views
12 votes
12 votes
What was George Washingtons stance on slavery

User Rajarshi Bhadra
by
2.9k points

2 Answers

25 votes
25 votes

Answer:

George Washington was actually a slave owner, but his stance on slavery evolved throughout his life. Initially, he viewed slavery as a necessary evil. However, as time went on, he became more critical of the institution and began to question its morality. In fact, in his will, he ordered that all the slaves he owned be freed upon his wife Martha's death. Additionally, during his presidency, he signed the Fugitive Slave Act into law, which required the return of escaped slaves to their owners, but he also took measures to ensure that his own slaves were treated humanely and well-cared for. It is important to note that while Washington did eventually free his slaves, he did not do so during his lifetime. Overall, his stance on slavery can be seen as complex and evolving.

Step-by-step explanation:

George Washington's stance on slavery evolved over time. As a young man, he owned enslaved people and was involved in the buying and selling of enslaved individuals. However, as he grew older and witnessed the suffering caused by slavery, his views began to shift.

In his will, Washington expressed his desire for the gradual emancipation of his enslaved people after the death of his wife. He believed that slavery was morally wrong and hoped for a future where enslaved individuals could gain their freedom.

Washington also played a role in the passage of the Northwest Ordinance of 1787, which prohibited slavery in the newly established territories north of the Ohio River.

While Washington's personal beliefs condemned slavery, he did not take immediate action to abolish it during his lifetime. Like many other Founding Fathers, he struggled with the complexities of the institution and the economic and social challenges associated with ending it.

It is important to note that Washington's stance on slavery was complex and reflected the contradictions of his time. Understanding his views requires considering the historical context and the gradual evolution of his beliefs.

User Alex Vazhev
by
2.7k points
18 votes
18 votes

Answer: Highly opposed. In fact, he left part of his estate to one of his slaves after he freed him. The slaves under Washington's care were educated, well fed, and never abused in any way, and Washington eventually freed all of them.

Step-by-step explanation:

User Phenex
by
2.9k points