56.3k views
5 votes
Read the paragraph from “A Cat Is Not a Can if Soup” and observe the boldfaced evidence to support the main argument. Have you been thinking of getting a pet? Wait a minute before you rush down to a pet shop: Adopting a pet from Ferndale shelter is often wiser move than buying one. However, many families hesitate to visit the shelter because they aren’t aware of its advantages or have mistaken ideas about what they will find there. The main argument is that adopting a pet from the Ferndale Shelyer is often a wiser move than buying one. Which best uses the evidence to evaluate the main argument? A: the argument is effective; the evidence explains why more families do not explore shelter adoption. B. The argument is ineffectiv; the evidence presents an invalid argument. C. The argument is ineffective; the evidence explains why more families do not explore shelter adoption D. The argument is effective; the evidence presents a valid argument

Help ASAP please

2 Answers

5 votes

Answer:

A

Step-by-step explanation:

i think it is a took the test and got it

User Samuel Gruetter
by
4.9k points
1 vote

Answer:

The answer to the question: Which best uses the evidence to evaluate the main argument, is, A: The argument is effective; the evidence explains why more families do not explore shelter adoption.

Step-by-step explanation:

In fact, the evidence given to the argument does not just explain why families do not explore adoption of shelter pets more, but it goes further to make the point that this idea is wrong because there are advantages to it that most people don´t know about, and a lot of misconceptions that are also wrong. Since the argument is that people would be wiser to choose an animal from the Ferndale Shelter, rather than buying one from a pet store, using the evidence that comes afterwards makes both argument and evidence effective to show people that there is much more to shelter adoption, positive, than negative, and thus people should give it a chance.

User Debbi
by
4.7k points