Answer:
The answer to the question: Which statement best compares the two passages, is, the first one: The first passage hints that the family should not trust Walter with money or business matters, and the second passage confirms it.
Step-by-step explanation:
"A Raisin in the Sun" is a play that was written by Lorraine Hansberry, and it was first presented to the public in 1959, in Broadway. The story narrates the happenings of the Younger family, and the differences in view inside the family regarding the way that an insurance payment for the death of the father should be used. While Mother wants it for Beneatha´s schooling and a new house, Walter wishes to invest it in an entrepeneurship with a supposed "friend", without knowing that what this friend wants is to take the entire money for himself. These two passages precisely show the conflict that arises between Mother and Walter because of this difference of view. Now, the first passage hints that no trust should be placed in Walter regarding business matters when he assures the man that he manages all of his mother´s business matters, and Beneatha and Ruth respond to this by exchanging amused glances, which allow the reader to know that this is a barefaced lie. And in the second passage we get the confirmation of what is hinted in the first when Mother, after finding out what happened, and that the money is gone, starts hitting her son, in anger, not recognizing him as her son, until Beneatha intervenes. Not only that, but Walter tries to lie to his mother at first, until she pushes so much that he caves in and tells her the truth. THis is why the answer is A.