Question

Which of the following is a correct comparison of the Hawaiian Islands and the Mississippi Delta?

The Hawaiian Islands were formed by constructive forces, but the Mississippi Delta was not.
The Mississippi Delta was formed by constructive forces, but the Hawaiian Islands were not.
Both the Hawaiian Islands and the Mississippi Delta were formed from constructive forces.
Neither the Hawaiian Islands not the Mississippi Delta were formed from constructive forces.

Answer 1

The Hawaiian Islands were formed by volcanic eruptions, but the Mississippi Delta was not.

Step-by-step explanation:

The Hawaiian Islands and the Mississippi Delta were formed through different geological processes. The Hawaiian Islands were formed from volcanic eruptions due to hotspot activity. The formation of the Mississippi Delta, on the other hand, is primarily attributed to the continental drift and the deposition of sediments carried by the Mississippi River.

Therefore, the correct comparison is that the Hawaiian Islands were formed by volcanic eruptions, but the Mississippi Delta was not.

Answer 2

Both the Hawaiian Islands and the Mississippi Delta were formed from constructive forces.

Step-by-step explanation:

Hawaiian Islands were formed from volcanism. Volcanism is a constructive process. Every year, huge volumes of magma is emplaced in the Hawaiian region. Hawaii keeps growing due to the volcanic forces at work.

A Delta is a depositional phase where sediments enters the ocean. Most rivers and streams have their final depositional basin in the ocean. As they approach the ocean, their velocity decreases substantially and deposition occurs. At a delta we see rivers dividing into distributaries and laying down sediments. A Delta is formed from a deposition of which is a constructive force.