Question

With rapid advancements of science and technology, the emergence of artificial intelligence is transforming traditional practices and systems. Its impact on recruitment and selection is evident that’s why it is predicted that the efficiency of artificial intelligence in screening resumes is exceeding 60,000 times as compare to doing it manually. However, the critics raise questions on its effectiveness. They are of the view that resumes solely cannot present the in-depth potentials of candidates therefore without having personalized interactions a perfect person-organization fit can’t be established.

Keeping in mind the pros and cons, how you foresee future of Artificial Intelligence in recruitment and selection process. Do you think it should eventually replace human recruiter or not? Discuss with logical arguments to prove your stance.

Answer 1

Step-by-step explanation:

The globalized and competitive business environment requires companies to be in line with new trends and market changes that happen very quickly around the world. Organizational automation is already happening on a large scale in large companies and the tendency is for artificial intelligence to reach more and more organizations, regardless of the sector or the size of the company.

In the human resources department, the crossing of information from the company and candidates can assist in a more effective and standardized recruitment and selection process for the company, with the chances of aligning the company's values ​​and skills with those of the professional sought. to complete the staff.

The main advantages of artificial intelligence in HR is the speed with which the process is carried out, the lowest cost and the highest standardization, but although it is advantageous, it is still not a sufficient process to replace the human recruiter in the decisive stages of the process, as artificial intelligence systems still need to achieve the subjectivity inherent to human beings, which is essential for the creation of the expected organizational climate.