Answer:
The description including its statement is encapsulated in the discussion portion below.
Step-by-step explanation:
- The hypothesis of Divine Right assumed that perhaps the Emperor had governed so even though God had positioned him mostly on the monarchy. Nobody could ever keep challenging the obligation of the Emperor to govern. The individuals would just have to follow the Leader, so that's what God commanded.
- The principle of structural or social contracts intended that there was a heritage-listed written agreement between some of the individuals as well as the emperor. The King seemed to have his accountability or duty, and the persons seemed to have about their liability.