Sooner or later every person on this Earth will eventually ask themself “What is the purpose of life?” and to find the answer many intern themselves in a religion to draw closer to God while others seek counsel from men who have sophisticated professions to ask what their point of view on life is. People who seek guidance from either parties usually end up confused, frustrated, overwhelmed, and resented because they eventually start believing that there is no truth to pursue. The magazine “The Purpose of Life” mentions the different opinions people have referring to life such as “working hard to better the conditions of life... live, have children and later die... acquire material possessions, [etc.]” But is this all there is to life? There are major differences between scientific knowledge and belief systems knowledge which can cause a person to get confused and feel a sense of hopelessness due to the corruption among some religious confessions and frustration due to the unrealistic points of views given by professionals.
If we look at the scientific perspective based on Scientists we can see that many of these trained professionals believe in Evolution which is considered a part of scientific knowledge. What many professionals disregard is that it is still a mere theory that is based on the opinions of one man whose actions were the same as the rest of us “imperfect” and whose ideas can be debunked and easily debatable. The magazine “The Purpose of Life” stated: “The American Encyclopedia highlighted the “extraordinary grade of complexity and organization [that is observed] in live organisms” and declared: “A meticulous examination of flower, insects, and mammals indicate that all it’s parts are orderly with a precision almost incredible” If something is so orderly and perfect, how can it then be a product of casualty? Molecular biology is one of the most recent studies in science which specializes in the study of organisms using genes, atoms and molecules. Molecular biologist Michael Denton said about his discoveries: “So much is the complexity of the simplest cell that it is known [for it to be] impossible to accept that such an object was done because of an improbable and [highly unlikely] coincidence” The magazine also even stated that: “The probability that from raw material, life could emerge is so unlikely that the idea must be discarded completely”. If such an idea is so unlikely why do many scientists and professionals believe in Evolution? Firstly, it is a theory that has been high esteemed through the 20th century onto the 21st century. Secondly, it is taught as a fact instead of a theory with no precise and concise evidence through schools and colleges worldwide. Thirdly, the concept itself is taught by professionals which therefore their words have automatic validation and only a small percentage doubt the theory’s liability. Fourthly, Evolution is a theory that is part of people’s popular opinion. The real question remains though, is evolution a liable source of scientific knowledge? The answer is no.
We have to recognize that there are various forms of religions and points of views that are completely different from one another. That is why many people who are in search of God find it so difficult to stay put to just one religion because there are millions of religious confessions that claim to rejoice in Gods favor but in the end fail to provide followers with mental, emotional and spiritual fulfillment. It's to acknowledge though that there are some belief systems that provide good standards, rules and morals that benefit the individual while others promote hate, fear, and intimidation; as in the case of the Catholic Church. Catholic beliefs claim that people who die either go to a heaven or a hell; beliefs such as these are not just illogical but anti-biblical as well. The Bible mentions that “God is Love” and a God whose entire personality is based on love would not make a place of torment for those who are already deceased. A documentary made by the “Watchtower Bible and trac” titled: “Out of the darkness” mentions that: “Christian churches deviated from Gods teachings, the result was the abuse of power and untold suffering... In the centuries after the establishment of the Christian congregation we see how many of those who were taking the lead in the Christian church started to likewise love worldly wisdom. These ideas that came from Plato and other of the Greek philosophers started to infiltrate the so-called Christian thinking... They wanted to mix Christian [religion] with pagan religious ideas and the idea was to make Christianity more acceptable to those [who did pagan worship]”