Question

Which statement best explains the differences between Mongol and American Indian trade? Mongols dominated Asian overland trade, while American Indians dominated only smaller regions. Mongols used their empire to control trade, while American Indians did not create empires. American Indians used regional trading networks, while Mongols focused on long-distance trade. American Indians’ trade was essential to their survival, while Mongols traded mainly luxury goods.

Answer 1

Mongol trade was characterized by large-scale, empire-wide facilitation of overland trade across Asia, while American Indian trade involved regional networks with essential goods for survival.

Step-by-step explanation:

The differences between Mongol and American Indian trade can be best explained by recognizing that the Mongols, especially during the Pax Mongolica, dominated and actively facilitated the overland trade routes across Asia, enhancing the movement of goods and cultural exchanges along the Silk Roads.

This control was based on their large, contiguous empire which allowed them to ensure the safety of traders and the reduction of taxes, thus encouraging commerce. In contrast, the American Indians engaged in regional trading networks that were smaller in scale and more focused on essential goods for survival rather than luxury items, without creating vast empires that influenced continental or intercontinental trade on the scale of the Mongols.

Answer 2

B. Mongols used their empire to control trade, while American Indians did not create empires.

Step-by-step explanation:

This is a fact. The main and most important effect of the Mongol Empire on the Silk Roads was how much safer it became and that was all a result of the Mongol imperial rule in Asia at the time. Basically, the Mongols used their power to facilitate trade along the Silk Roads and the American Indians relied on a close-knit regional trading system.