Final answer:
Persuasive writing intends to persuade, and a strong thesis statement is crucial for an effective argument. The stop-and-frisk example contains a causal fallacy, attributing the drop in crime rate directly to the policy. Debatable claims, expert testimony, and clear and concise arguments strengthen persuasive writing.
Step-by-step explanation:
Persuasive Writing and Argument Analysis
The purpose of persuasive writing is to persuade the reader to accept a particular point of view or to take a specific action. Unlike informative writing which aims to inform or narrative writing which tells a story, persuasive writing advocates for a particular position and supports this stance with evidence and reasoning. This type of writing is epitomized by a strong thesis statement, which is crucial to building an effective argument and is usually found at the end of the introduction.
Analysis of a Persuasive Argument
In analyzing the provided passage about New York City's stop-and-frisk policy, the main issue is the assumption that the policy caused a drop in the crime rate. This is an example of a causal fallacy, where the argument assumes a cause-effect relationship without providing sufficient evidence of causation. It is necessary to consider other factors that may have contributed to the reduced crime rate to make a more grounded argument.
Identifying Debatable Claims
The sentence that expresses a debatable claim in the argument project example is 'Because whole grains are an essential part of a healthy diet, we should eat them.' This is an opinion that can be supported or refuted with evidence and reasoning, making it debatable.
Expert Testimony as Evidence
The statement that serves as an example of expert testimony used as evidence is 'According to the Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, pipelines are undoubtedly the safest way to transport petroleum products.' This uses an authority in the subject matter to support a claim, illustrating the use of expert opinions to strengthen persuasive arguments.
Appropriate Claims for Brief Argument Projects
For a brief argument project, an appropriate claim would be 'Collars that deliver electrical shocks to the neck of a dog are a cruel and unnecessary form of training; therefore, they should be banned for use by the general public.' This is clear, debatable, and sets the stage for presenting supporting evidence and reasoning.