Final answer:
Jared Diamond cautions against relying on technology to avert civilization collapse, highlighting the risks of pushing boundaries without foresight, the absence of a comprehensive sustainability plan, and the nonlinear nature of societal disruptions.
Step-by-step explanation:
While technology holds the promise of solving many of our current problems, Jared Diamond's arguments suggest prudence. Diamond outlines several reasons why blindly trusting technology could lead to greater perils rather than averting the collapse of civilization. First, there is an undeniable asymmetry in the risks we take when pushing technological boundaries without foresight -- the consequences could be catastrophic and irreversible. Second, the lack of a comprehensive and widely accepted plan for a sustainable future signifies that mere faith in human inventiveness is inadequate to address the complexities and scale of the challenges we face. Lastly, the nonlinear nature of human societies implies that disruptions, whether due to resource shortages or technological failures, can lead to rapid and unmanageable collapse far faster than linear predictions suggest.
Facing these daunting realities, it becomes clear that we cannot allow the comfort of denial or the seduction of unfounded optimism to lull us into complacency. Recognizing the myriad of challenges -- from energy scarcity and soil degradation to climate change and inequitable resource distribution -- requires serious, detailed, and actionable strategies rather than a general reliance on 'human innovation.'