15.9k views
2 votes
Why would a researcher use a primary source instead of a secondary source when analyzing a historical event?

A. To view a collection of different opinions on the event
B. To provide a scholarly perspective on the event
C. To evaluate the perspective of a witness to the event
D. To find out how people currently remember the event

User Plusor
by
8.5k points

2 Answers

2 votes

I would believe the answer is C. To evaluate the perspective of a witness to the event

User Tsh
by
7.7k points
7 votes

c) To evaluate the perspective of a witness to the event

hope this helps!

User Kirsten Jones
by
9.0k points

No related questions found

Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.