Question

3 Paragraphs

Please help!
Part C - Write foreign policy proposal.
Write your report to the government of Karmin in the form of a three-paragraph essay. Use this rubric e to guide your
to response. Be sure to answer the following questions:
1. What do you think your country's foreign policy goals should be? Do you want to gain power and influence overseas or
simply protect your sovereignty? Explain why you think these goals are appropriate, using historical examples.
2. Should the country align itself with or NATO, the Warsaw Pact, or the Unaligned Movement? Explain your answer, using
historical examples.
3. However the country chooses to align itself, what type of foreign policy should it have toward the rest of the world?
Should it be more aggressive or more diplomatic? Explain your answer, using historical examples.

Answer 1

Karmin's foreign policy should prioritize sovereignty and peaceful relations, favoring diplomacy over aggression. While NATO offers collective security, the Non-Aligned Movement provides autonomy. Historical precedents suggest that diplomacy fosters long-term stability and global cooperation.

Step-by-step explanation:

The foreign policy goals of Karmin should prioritize the protection of sovereignty and the pursuit of peaceful global relations. Reflecting on the downfall of aggressive empires throughout history, it's clear that balance and diplomacy lead to longer-term stability and prosperity. For instance, the British Empire's decline post-World War II exemplifies the unsustainable nature of excessive overseas influence and control. Instead, Karmin should learn from nations like Switzerland, which has thrived on neutrality and diplomacy.

Aligning with international organizations must be strategic; the Warsaw Pact is defunct, making NATO an option, or Karmin could join the Non-Aligned Movement. Considering historical outcomes, alignment with NATO could offer defense benefits and collective security, as seen in Western Europe during the Cold War. However, neutral affiliation, similar to the Non-Aligned Movement adopted by countries like India, allowed for autonomy in foreign policy decisions and minimized entanglement in superpower rivalries.

Karmin's foreign policy should lean towards diplomacy rather than aggression. Countries such as Norway and Canada have set examples of diplomatic foreign policy, engaging in peacekeeping and conflict resolution successfully. An aggressive stance, as exhibited by the U.S. in its neoconservative era, sometimes led to protracted conflicts and international criticism. Diplomacy encourages international cooperation and fosters a global environment conducive to addressing transnational issues like climate change, thereby securing Karmin's long-term interests on the world stage.