9.5k views
3 votes
Jada solved the equation below what was jada’s error ?

Jada solved the equation below what was jada’s error ?-example-1

2 Answers

2 votes

Answer:

a

Explanation:

User Brandon McConnell
by
5.8k points
3 votes

Answer:

Jada should have multiplied both sides of the equation by 108.

Explanation:

The goal of any equation is to isolate and solve for the variable. In the case of the proportion given, the variable in the form of a fraction. In order to get the 'x' by itself, you need to complete the inverse (opposite) of division, which is multiplication, to remove the denominator of '108.'


((108)/(1))-(4)/(9)=(x)/(108)((108)/(1))


-(432)/(9)=x

-48 = x

User WojtekT
by
4.9k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.