Final answer:
Charles I signed the Petition of Right to obtain funds from Parliament but then dismissed Parliament and ignored the Petition, contributing to the tensions that led to the English Civil War and his eventual execution.
Step-by-step explanation:
In the historical context of the British constitutional evolution, King Charles I's interaction with Parliament was particularly contentious. The correct response to what Charles I did in relation to the Petition of Rights is that he signed it just to get treasury funds and then subsequently dismissed Parliament and defied the Petition. This act further strained the already tumultuous relationship between the monarchy and Parliament, setting the stage for the eventual English Civil War.
The Petition of Right was a significant document presented by Parliament in 1628 during Charles I's reign. It aimed to resolve several governance issues, such as unauthorized taxation and imprisonment without cause. This was a critical moment where Parliament sought to restrict the king's authority and assert its own rights in the face of what was perceived as tyrannical rule. By signing the Petition, Charles I initially appeared to accept its terms, yet his subsequent actions revealed that his agreement was superficial, primarily motivated by his urgent need for funds rather than a true concession to constitutional principles. The period following the Petition's signing was marked by Charles I's attempt to govern without Parliament, further exacerbating conflicts that fueled the Civil War and ultimately led to his execution in 1649.