Register
Why is non-point source pollution potentially more harmful than point source pollution?
119k views
5 votes
Why is non-point source pollution potentially more harmful than point source pollution?

User Nitin Tyagi
by
4.6k points

2 Answers

3 votes

Answer:

The answer is D Nonpoint source pollution is more damaging to living organisms than point source pollution.

Step-by-step explanation:

User Dorvak
by
5.0k points
3 votes
NPS is more harmful because difficult to regulate it
User Bongo Sharp
by
5.2k points
Ask a Question
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

5.8m questions

7.5m answers

Other Questions

Which of these structures is primarily responsible for the enzymatic breakdown of a large molecules in the cell?
What are some common signs and symptoms of mental health disorders?
Which statement BEST describes the relationship between adenosine diphosphate (ADP) and adenosine triphosphate (ATP)? A. With an input of energy, ADP rearranges to become ATP. B. Without any energy change,
A state of joyful activity in which the subject performs an action effortlessly and skillfully is known as a(n) __________.
!! Earth Science!! Carbon dioxide is normally approximately 2% fraction of the air in the atmosphere. The reason carbon dioxide is considered a pollutant is because... a) Carbon dioxide levels are much
Link Copied!