Answer:
Part a) The inequality that represent the situation is
Part b) The possible lengths of the shortest piece of wire are all positive real numbers less than or equal to
![35\ inches](https://img.qammunity.org/2020/formulas/mathematics/middle-school/wba9xgi9hu3c8iaomqja62b7sf7cnm4vf6.png)
Explanation:
Let
x------> the length of the first wire
3x---> the length of the second wire
2(3x)=6x -----> the length of the third wire
Part a) WRITE AN *INEQUALITY* THAT MODELS THE SITUATION
we know that
The inequality that represent the situation is
![x+(3x)+(6x) \leq 350](https://img.qammunity.org/2020/formulas/mathematics/middle-school/63za436zp9pqer1jlust17yqslr9q2914e.png)
Part b) WHAT ARE THE POSSIBLE LENGTHS OF THE SHORTEST PIECE OF WIRE?
we know that
The shortest piece of wire is the first wire
so
Solve the inequality
![x+(3x)+(6x) \leq 350](https://img.qammunity.org/2020/formulas/mathematics/middle-school/63za436zp9pqer1jlust17yqslr9q2914e.png)
![10x \leq 350](https://img.qammunity.org/2020/formulas/mathematics/middle-school/ycsd4jyrvhq81z8omohij39pogttfqxxbz.png)
Divide by 10 both sides
![x \leq 35\ in](https://img.qammunity.org/2020/formulas/mathematics/middle-school/fumlo65f0suodbzba1mn4rsg2tz200itkt.png)
The possible lengths of the shortest piece of wire are all positive real numbers less than or equal to
![35\ inches](https://img.qammunity.org/2020/formulas/mathematics/middle-school/wba9xgi9hu3c8iaomqja62b7sf7cnm4vf6.png)