Question

Read the excerpt from "A Defense of Veganism":

The next claim made against veganism is that a vegan diet does not provide enough protein. Without meat or eggs, the argument goes, a person cannot get enough amino acids. This is absolutely untrue. MNN poses an interesting breakdown of a day's protein consumption for vegans based on the U.S. Department of Agriculture's dietary guidelines. According to these guidelines, an adult male needs 56 grams, and an adult woman needs 46 grams of protein. By putting together a sample breakfast, lunch, and dinner composed of such foods as soy derivatives, bulgur wheat, lentils, nuts, and beans, the average daily protein needs can be easily met.

How does the author address the counterclaim in this excerpt?

A.By listing reasons why people do not need large amounts of protein

B.By citing research about the amount of protein in vegan foods

C.By providing reasons why vegetarian sources do not provide enough protein

D.By using an analogy to help the reader understand protein

Answer 1

B.By citing research about the amount of protein in vegan foods

Step-by-step explanation:

It is common to find research works, class assignments, etc., without any quote or bibliographic reference that tells us where the information was extracted from Author. Many people consider that quoting authors would show that their text does not It is totally original, subtracting, (according to your point of view), merit to your work. Nothing farther from reality. A good scientific work is one that is well documented. Correct use of citations, and the inclusion of references bibliographic references, (better known as bibliography at the end of the work), show no only the honesty of the person in recognizing that the work has not left his mind, If not also that that person has been documented, has read the main previous contributions of people better knowledgeable about the subject, and therefore the document has been subjected to careful study.