29.2k views
1 vote
Carol wants to buy a plot of land for $100,000 however she cannot decide whether she wants to build a small one story house on it or a large two-story house on it.

Why should Carol build the smaller house that will cost less assuming she wants to spend as little money as possible?




A: since the cost of the land is variable Carol can maximize her use of it by building the smaller house



B: since the cost of the land is high Carol can increase the demand for it by building the smaller house.


C: Since the cost of the land is fixed Carol can limit the variable cost of construction is by building the smaller house



D: since the cost of the land is low Carol can decrease the trade-offs she must make by building the smaller house.



help please!!!

User Yamileth
by
9.1k points

2 Answers

3 votes

Answer:

C.) Since the cost of the land is fixed, Carol can limit the variable cost of construction by building the smaller house.

Step-by-step explanation:

I took the test and this is the correct answer.

User Causa Prima
by
7.8k points
5 votes

The correct answer is "A".

The land is an asset that does not depreciate. On the contrary, its value tends to rise over time. If Carol decides to buy a small house, she will benefit in two ways:

  • She will spend less on materials that will depreciate (lose value) over time.
  • She can benefit by leasing or even selling land in the mid-term, making a profit as the value of that portion of her property will be higher than what it is now.
User Ahmed Samir
by
7.5k points

No related questions found

Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.