The text structure underscores the central idea by portraying leadership roles, like that of the superintendent as autonomous and respected, reflecting on the prince's ability to delegate power. The comparison of punishments serves to emphasize the gravity of certain disciplinary methods, supporting themes of justice and mercy in leadership.
The author's central idea that a prince is judged by the quality of his servants can be understood through the text structure and the role it plays in conveying the message. For example, when the author refers to the superintendent of the mines as "a king in his dominions," it emphasizes the importance of leadership roles and the reflection of the prince's virtues through the actions of his subordinates.
The term 'king' suggests a high level of autonomy and respect within the superintendent's scope of authority, which implies that the prince has bestowed significant trust and responsibility on him. This, in turn, indicates that the prince himself is discerning and capable of delegating power wisely.
Comparatively, the use of the phrase "childish punishments" to describe the privation of food and the black hole relative to a whipping underscores the gravity of the latter as a form of discipline. It implies that such severe measures are considered more adult or serious and reflect the magnitude of certain transgressions and the corresponding response expected from a principled leader. Contrast in disciplinary methods also highlights the themes of justice and mercy in leadership, as outlined by the text.