70.8k views
0 votes
How would you settle Frost's debate: is fiery, passionate anger more or less destructive than cool, calculated reason? Explain your answer with textual evidence.

User Sacheen
by
7.3k points

1 Answer

5 votes

Final answer:

Fiery, passionate anger and cool, calculated reason can both be destructive, but in different ways.

Step-by-step explanation:

In Robert Frost's poem “Fire and Ice,” the speaker discusses two different possibilities for how the world will end: fire and ice. The speaker states that they hold with those who favor fire, indicating that fiery, passionate anger is more destructive. However, the speaker also acknowledges that for destruction, ice would suffice. This suggests that cool, calculated reason can also be destructive, but in a different way. Both forms of destruction carry their own dangers and consequences.