102k views
1 vote
When justice fortas refers to keyishan v. board of regents in the majority opinion for tinker vs des moines, what kind of reasoning is he using to support his argument

A. Pathos
B. Judicial Review
C. Predecent
D. Straw man

User Zggame
by
6.6k points

1 Answer

6 votes

The correct option is C: Precedent

When Justice Fortas referred to Keyishian v. Board of Regents in the majority opinion for Tinker v. Des Moines, he used a precent reasoning in order to support his argument as he was an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States.

The precedent is a kind of reasoning that is used to justify the decision of a court that has a special legal significance.

User Rob Willis
by
6.9k points