79.3k views
1 vote
Compare and contrast the drive-reduction theory and the incentive theory of motivation.

Both theories attempt to explain what motivates personal behavior in people. The drive-reduction theory of motivation explains how internal states of tension motivate individuals to act. It also describes the source of motivation as being within the organism, such as the way that hunger or exhaustion lies within us. However, the incentive theory of motivation explains how external things motivate individuals to act, and it describes the source of motivation as being outside of the organism, such as the way that rewards or punishments are external.

User DLaw
by
4.4k points

2 Answers

2 votes

Answer:

Both theories attempt to explain what motivates personal behavior in people. The drive-reduction theory of motivation explains how internal states of tension motivate individuals to act. It also describes the source of motivation as being within the organism, such as the way that hunger or exhaustion lies within us. However, the incentive theory of motivation explains how external things motivate individuals to act, and it describes the source of motivation as being outside of the organism, such as the way that rewards or punishments are external.

Step-by-step explanation:

User Anuj Dhiman
by
4.4k points
6 votes

Answer:

Incentive theory of motivation suggests that external factors such as reward or punishment serve as a driving force which motivates humans to act. The external factors trigger a person to perform a task or activity to get the reward or avoid the punishment.

The drive-reduction theory explains that internal biological needs of a human trigger a person to act. If these biological needs remain unmet, they cause an internal tension such as hunger. These biological needs serve as a driving force for motivation.

User Shaunelle
by
4.6k points