62.1k views
18 votes
Question 1 of 20

When Justice Fortas refers to Keyishian v. Board of Regents in the majority
opinion for Tinker v. Des Moines, which kind of reasoning is he using to
support his argument?
A. Straw man
B. Pathos
C. Precedent
D. Judicial review

User Flower
by
4.5k points

1 Answer

9 votes

Answer:

C. Precedent.

A precedent is a principle or rule established in a previous legal case that is either binding on or persuasive without going to courts for a court or other tribunal when deciding subsequent cases with similar issues or facts.

User Orangutech
by
4.9k points