Final answer:
Georgia was initially different from other southern colonies due to the prohibition of a representative assembly, rum, and African slavery, and its governance by the Georgia Trustees. Over time, however, these differences lessened, especially when slavery became legal in the 1750s.
Step-by-step explanation:
Georgia had several unique founding principles compared to the other southern colonies. The Georgia Trustees, who governed the colony, implemented specific rules. Here's how Georgia compared to the other southern colonies:
- Georgia was not allowed to have a representative assembly - Different: Unlike other colonies that eventually had representative assemblies, the Georgia Trustees maintained control without establishing an assembly.
- Rum and African slavery were prohibited - Different: Georgia initially stood out for these bans under the Trustees. However, colonists, particularly those from South Carolina, often disregarded these prohibitions.
- The king set up a corporation to help colonize Georgia - Same: Much like other colonies, Georgia was helped by a corporation set up by the king, although specifically, it was a Board of Trustees acting on behalf of the crown.
- Georgia sought to establish a good relationship with local American Indians - Same: This was a common goal for many colonies, both for trading purposes and to ensure a peaceful coexistence.
By the 1750s, Slavery made legal in Georgia, aligning with the other southern colonies in this regard which indicates a shift from the original vision of the colony's founders.