Final answer:
An absolute monarch from Spain or Russia would most likely have disagreed with the bishop's viewpoint on parliamentary independence, as such monarchs supported the concept of absolute rule and opposed limiting their power.
Step-by-step explanation:
Given the historical context provided, an absolute monarch from Spain or Russia would most likely have disagreed with the bishop's point of view advocating for Parliament's independence from the monarchy. Absolute monarchies, like those of Spain and Russia during that era, centered on the idea that the monarch held supreme authority, particularly over the church and state matters. They would generally oppose any notion that suggested limiting their power or promoting the autonomy of a parliamentary body.
This view contrasts with England's historical tension, where Parliament opposed the idea of a Catholic monarch due to the potential for religious influence over national governance, implying a loss of political autonomy and recalling the troubled relationship between the monarchy and the Catholic Church, as highlighted by the information provided. The investiture controversy and other reforms had already caused a shift in how the church and state interacted, further reinforcing the autonomy and power of religious authorities separate from monarchical influence.