Final answer:
A justice who agrees with the majority's conclusions about a case, but does so for different reasons, would write a d. concurring opinion.
Step-by-step explanation:
A justice who agrees with the majority's conclusions about a case, but does so for different reasons, would write a concurring opinion. This is an opinion written by a justice who agrees with the Court's majority opinion but has different reasons for doing so. It allows the justice to express their viewpoint and highlight a different point of law or reason for reaching the same conclusion.
Thus, a concurring opinion is a written statement by a judge who agrees with the majority's decision in a legal case but offers additional or different reasoning. It provides an individual judge's perspective, supporting the outcome while expressing nuanced legal interpretations or emphasizing particular aspects of the case.