Question

Read the counterclaim. Opponents of using tablets as a replacement for textbooks point out the high cost of implementing a system of this technology in a school system. Which statements are examples of a fair and logical rebuttal to the counterclaim? Select two options. These opponents point to the nearly 60-dollar difference in cost per pupil to a school district, which, in their defense, is quite significant. While tablets are expensive, most buyers can save money in the long run by purchasing e-textbooks instead of print books. The bottom line is that everything costs money, so complaining about the cost of tablets is pointless and unnecessary, especially when student growth is at stake. However, the amount of money districts spend on paper used for copies, which tablets would largely replace, balances the implementation cost. Most students find tablets fun and easy to use, all but guaranteeing an easy transition from print books.

Answer 1

B: While tablets are expensive, most buyers can save money in the long run by purchasing e-textbooks instead of print books.

D: However, the amount of money districts spend on paper used for copies, which tablets would largely replace, balances the implementation cost.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer 2

• While tablets are expensive, most buyers can save money in the long run by purchasing e-textbooks instead of print books.

• However, the amount of money districts spend on paper used for copies, which tablets would largely replace, balances the implementation cost.

These two sentences are the best rebuttals to the counterclaim. The first answer is effective because it directly addresses the main concern of the opponents: the price of the tablets. It considers the counterclaim, accepts it, but provides a reason why this is not necessarily a problem.

The second answer similarly tackles the problem of funds, and provides a solution. The fact that paper would be less necessary eliminates the problem of cost, and reduces the effectiveness of the counterclaim.