Question

Which of the following is NOT an example of a fallacious reasoning?

Question 1 options:

a)

parallelism


b)

bandwagon


c)

generalization


d)

oversimplification

Answer 1

D. Oversimplification.

Step-by-step explanation:

Oversimplification is not the example of fallacious reasoning. This is because it does not make use of any faulty reasonings or invalid concepts. It has no intention of manipulating with any deceptive measures. It is a sound method with fair dependence on the contexts of basing the arguments. It is not persuasive in common use and does not have unsubstantiated assertions. Thus, among the others, oversimplification does not qualify for the condition of becoming a fallacious reasoning.

Answer 2

Your answer here is A.

Step-by-step explanation:

Parallelism is a balance within sentences of similar phrases, which means that the sentence repeats words that are alike. For example, "She likes singing, reading, and dancing." or "She likes to sing, read, and dance."

Fallacious reasoning is an irrational argument, for instance, "All African Americans like rap music." this is a generalization of one specific race, and shouldn't be used as evidence to back up one's claim.

Hopefully this cleared some things up! :)