Question

You just saw that free speech was limited to protect the country during war time what other limits do you think should be placed on free speech

1)limiting hate speech

2)stopping protest

3)banning criticism of the president

4)limiting what can be published and written

5)limiting profanity or obscene speech

6)banning questionable book

7)encouraging people to commit act of violence

8)nolimits

Answer 1

Freedom of speech is not absolute. There are limits on speech that incites criminal acts, constitutes 'fighting words,' or poses genuine threats. Content-based limitations on speech are allowed in certain circumstances.

Step-by-step explanation:

Freedom of speech is not absolute, and there are several key restrictions on it. While the Constitution protects most forms of offensive and unpopular expression, there are limits on speech that incites criminal acts, constitutes 'fighting words,' or poses genuine threats.

Additionally, defamation of character through libel or slander is not protected. However, content-based limitations on speech are allowed in certain circumstances, such as obscenity, subversive speech, or speech promoting violence against the government. Overall, while there are restrictions on free speech, it is important to strike a balance between protecting individual rights and ensuring the safety and well-being of society.