Final answer:
The authors have the common purpose of demonstrating how the justice system can mentally affect individuals, using examples from the history of imprisonments, the controversy over the death penalty, rehabilitation struggles, and the need for fair public trials.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement that best describes how the authors’ purposes are similar is that they both want to show how the conviction system affects people mentally. These narratives delve into the complexities of the justice system and its impact on individuals, especially those who may face unjust convictions. Discussions around the history of jails and prisons in America, debates about the death penalty, the effectiveness of rehabilitation, and the struggle of immigrants and radicals against an unfair justice system all relate to the psychological effects of the judicial process on individuals. Moreover, issues such as the necessity for a speedy and public trial further underline the significance of mental and emotional burdens on the accused.
While each author may have different specific aims, such as encouraging others to fight for changes or sharing personal narratives, the overarching theme in their work is the need to bring to light the injustices and harsh realities faced by those within the system, as well as the psychological toll it can take. This includes the understanding that the legal system should focus on enforcing laws equitably, the role of the Supreme Court in protecting rights, and the importance of transparency as demonstrated through public trials.