Final answer:
When anticipating a tornado, individuals consider either taking no action (Plan A) or actively preparing by boarding up and seeking shelter (Plan B), with different costs and emotional outcomes associated with each. Emergency situations require community support to augment core response team efforts.
Step-by-step explanation:
Decision Making in Emergency Preparedness:
When facing a potential natural disaster like a tornado, individuals and communities must weigh the costs and benefits of different courses of action. If a tornado were reported heading toward a town, residents might consider two main plans of action: Plan A, which involves doing nothing in preparation, and Plan B, which would be to board up windows and take cover in a tornado shelter.
For Plan A, the costs might be minimal since no action is taken, but if the tornado does hit, the outcomes could be catastrophic, with a sense of regret and helplessness in the aftermath. Plan B, on the other hand, requires more effort and resources upfront to protect the home, yet if the tornado strikes, the residents are likely to feel a sense of relief and preparedness, having potentially minimized damage and injury.
In the context of community response, individuals like Kaley and the larger support team would play a crucial role in assisting core response teams, who often find their resources stretched thin in the wake of such disasters. This collaborative effort reflects the importance of response planning and the involvement of different community groups in emergency situations.=