175k views
5 votes
There is no smallest positive rational number because, if there were, then it could be divided by two to get a smaller one. EXPLAINED

1 Answer

2 votes

Answer:

Since a/2⁽ⁿ ⁺ ¹⁾b < a/2ⁿb, we cannot find a smallest positive rational number because there would always be a number smaller than that number if it were divided by half.

Explanation:

Let a/b be the rational number in its simplest form. If we divide a/b by 2, we get another rational number a/2b. a/2b < a/b. If we divide a/2b we have a/2b ÷ 2 = a/4b = a/2²b. So, for a given rational number a/b divided by 2, n times, we have our new number c = a/2ⁿb where n ≥ 1

Since
\lim_(n \to \infty) (a)/(2^(n)b ) = a/(2^∞)b = a/b × 1/∞ = a/b × 0 = 0, the sequence converges.

Now for each successive division by 2, a/2⁽ⁿ ⁺ ¹⁾b < a/2ⁿb and

a/2⁽ⁿ ⁺ ¹⁾b/a/2ⁿb = 1/2, so the next number is always half the previous number.

So, we cannot find a smallest positive rational number because there would always be a number smaller than that number if it were divided by half.

User Korakot
by
6.7k points

No related questions found

Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.