Answer:
1. You and a friend apply for a job at a hardware store and you believe that you are more qualified, but your friend is offered the job and you are not.
Outcome Fairness
2. You find out that your friend's uncle is the hiring manager for the company you both work for.
Procedural Justice
3. Although you did not receive a job offer, the human resources representative called to explain why he thought your friend was more qualified than you.
Interactional Justice
4. Your manager approaches you about a promotion you did not receive and respectfully explains that although you did not get the promotion, your superb characteristics make you a strong candidate next time. ((Click to select)
Interactional Justice
5. Your co-worker who received a promotion when you did not was a college buddy of your manager who lunches with him weekly.
Procedural Justice
6. You approach your HR manager about what you see as unequal distribution of family benefits. She empathizes and asks how to assist with your family needs. ((Click to select)
Interactional Justice
7. Your co-worker receives a promotion that you applied for and did not receive.
Outcome Fairness
8. You realize that female employees seem to be receiving more perks and family-related benefits than male employees in the organization.
Procedural Justice
9. You did not receive a raise because your manager did not think you finished your major project for the year even though it was completed last week. ((Click to select)
Procedural Justice
10. You notice that some individuals in the organization are receiving more family-related benefits than others. ((Click to select)
Outcome fairness
11. You talk to your manager about not receiving a raise and think it is because your project was not finished. He listens and discusses how to resolve the issue.
Interactional Justice
12. Your manager gives pay raises to half of your team, but you do not receive one.
Outcome Fairness
Step-by-step explanation:
The three identified principles of justice are outcome fairness, procedural justice, and interactional justice. Outcome fairness refers to the perception of the fairness of the distribution of outcomes. Procedural fairness refers to the fairness in the procedures followed when arriving at a decision or judgement. Interactional fairness refers to the interpersonal and information fairness that is shown in implementing procedures. Outcome fairness concentrates on the ends, while procedural and interactional justices focus on the means to the ends.