A statement that will accurately correct the two-column proof is: C. The three angles of ΔPQR equal 180° according to Substitution.
In Mathematics and Geometry, a supplementary angle refers to two (2) angles or arc whose sum is equal to 180 degrees.
Additionally, the sum of all of the angles on a straight line is always equal to 180 degrees. Since line ZY parallel to segment PQ, we have the following angle sum based on Angle Addition Postulate;
m∠ZRP + m∠PRQ + m∠QRY = m∠ZRY
By using the substitution method, we can reasonably infer and logically deduce the following supplementary angles in triangle PQR:
m∠RPQ + m∠PRQ + m∠PQR = m∠ZRY
m∠RPQ + m∠PRQ + m∠PQR = 180°
Complete Question:
Below is a two-column proof incorrectly proving that the three angles of ΔPQR sum to 180°:
Which statement will accurately correct the two-column proof?
A. The measure of angle ZRY equals 180° by definition of supplementary angles.
B. Angles QRY and PQR should be proven congruent before the construction of line ZY.
C. The three angles of ΔPQR equal 180° according to Substitution.
D. Line ZY should be drawn parallel to segment QR.