Final answer:
Terrace farming was utilized in mountainous regions to create flat areas for agriculture, while slash-and-burn agriculture involved clearing and burning forest land in rainforests to enrich the soil for farming. therefore, option A is correct
Step-by-step explanation:
The statement that best explains how terrace farming differed from slash-and-burn agriculture is: A. Terrace farming was used to grow crops in mountain areas, while slash-and-burn agriculture was used to grow crops in rainforests. Terrace farming involves cutting out flat areas or terraces into near vertical slopes, which allows cultivation on mountainsides, commonly seen in the early Chinese and Inca civilizations. This method is beneficial for growing enough food for large populations. On the other hand, slash-and-burn agriculture is practiced by clearing forest land, burning the felled vegetation, and using the ash as fertilizer to rejuvenate nutrient-poor soil, which is common in rainforest environments where large areas can be cultivated with minimal labor input. Slash-and-burn is a form of land rotation farming that is caloric efficient and sustainable when population demands are low.
the complete Question is given below:
Which statement best explains how terrace farming differed from slash-and-burn agriculture?
A. Terrace farming was used to grow crops in mountain areas, while slash-and-burn agriculture was used to grow crops in rainforests.
B. Terrace farming was used to grow crops in rainforests, while slash-and-burn agriculture was used to grow crops in mountain areas.
C. Terrace farming allowed farmers to grow a variety of crops, while slash-and-burn agriculture could only be used to grow corn.
D. Terrace farming could only be used to grow corn, while slash-and-burn agriculture allowed farmers to grow a variety of crops.