Answer:
See proof below
Explanation:
Important points
- understanding what it means to be "onto"
- the nature of a quadratic function
- finding a value that isn't in the range
Onto
For a function with a given co-domain to be "onto," every element of the co-domain must be an element of the range.
However, the co-domain here is suggested to be
, whereas the range of f is not
(proof below).
Proof (contradiction)
Suppose that f is onto
.
Consider the output 7 (a specific element of
).
Since f is onto
, there must exist some input from the domain
, "p", such that f(p) = 7.
Substitute and solve to find values for "p".
![f(x)=-3x^2+4\\f(p)=-3(p)^2+4\\7=-3p^2+4\\3=-3p^2\\-1=p^2](https://img.qammunity.org/2023/formulas/mathematics/college/ngxr52dl799929joga4uqscfqqoyrz6wgh.png)
Next, apply the square root property:
![\pm โ(-1) =โ(p^2)](https://img.qammunity.org/2023/formulas/mathematics/college/ojlgzgnxtskhxwt6sb85nycilka3y1ig1d.png)
By definition,
, so
![i=p \text{ or } -i =p](https://img.qammunity.org/2023/formulas/mathematics/college/5tu4xr0dh0q7kcnswzlbzn3mwl5b8kan3p.png)
By the Fundamental Theorem of Algebra, any polynomial of degree n with complex coefficients, has exactly n complex roots. Since the degree of f is 2, there are exactly 2 roots, and we've found them both, so we've found all of them.
However, neither
nor
are in
, so there are zero values of p in
for which f(p)= 7, which is a contradiction.
Therefore, the contradiction supposition must be false, proving that f is not onto
![\mathbb R](https://img.qammunity.org/2023/formulas/mathematics/college/2ok18peutml8w88c35bas5sct4exerey65.png)